翻訳と辞書 |
Henry v London Greater Transport Services : ウィキペディア英語版 | Henry v London Greater Transport Services
''Henry v London Greater Transport Services Ltd'' () (EWCA Civ 488 ) is a UK labour law case concerning the scope of protection for people to employment rights. It took the view that an employment contract requires ==Facts== The Transport and General Workers Union negotiated with a management buy-out (via share transfer) prospector for a collective agreement that would mean less pay and worse conditions for members. 63 members, including Mr Carlton Henry, objected. The other 1500 agreed to it. The 63 claimed for unlawful wage deductions under ERA 1996 s 13. Had their contracts been varied by collective agreement, in absence of an express incorporation clause in their contracts? There had been no ballot, which was workplace custom, so the 63 argued that there was no incorporation. Mr S Juss represented the workers. The Employment Tribunal upheld the claim of the 63, and by continuing to work for 2 years under protest, they had never consented. However the Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employer’s appeal, but remitted to trial whether a ballot was in fact reasonable, certain and notorious.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Henry v London Greater Transport Services」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|